Official Source: Chapter 12 - Primarily Formed Committees Reporting Independent Expenditures
This chapter is for committees that want to spend serious money to support or oppose a candidate without asking for that candidate's permission or input. In the political world, these are often called "Independent Expenditure" committees or "Primarily Formed Committees."
The defining feature of this chapter is the Iron Wall. On one side is the candidate; on the other is you. You can spend unlimited amounts of money helping them, but you cannot talk to them about it. If you coordinate, your unlimited spending becomes a "contribution" and is subject to strict limits (and potential legal violations).
You fall into this category if you form a group specifically to:
Since you are not the candidate, and you aren't controlled by them, you are "Independent."
An Independent Expenditure is a payment for a communication (like an ad, mailer, or billboard) that meets two criteria:
To keep your expenditure "independent," you must maintain total separation from the candidate.
If you break this wall, your spending counts as a Non-Monetary Contribution (subject to the limits in Chapter 1). Since most ad buys cost far more than the contribution limit, "coordinating" usually results in an immediate and massive violation of the law.
When you start spending money independently, the public has a right to know immediately. The reporting deadlines here are extremely fast—often 24 hours.
This is the most critical form for independent groups during election season.
Crucial Note: If you buy a TV ad on Monday for $5,000, you file on Tuesday. If you buy another $2,000 ad on Wednesday, you file again on Thursday. Every batch of $1,000+ gets reported.
The state requires a human being to sign a legal document swearing that they did not coordinate with the candidate.
Just like candidate committees, you must file the standard Form 460 at semi-annual and pre-election intervals (see Chapter 10).
If your committee is a major player, you have extra disclosure rules.
Can a candidate spend their own campaign funds to independently support another candidate?
If you plan to run an ad supporting "Jane Doe for Senate" without her involvement:
| Step | Action | Form | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Check Coordination | Ensure no one on your team has talked to Jane Doe's team about this ad. | N/A |
| 2 | Buy the Ad | Spend the money (e.g., $5,000 for a mailer). | N/A |
| 3 | File 24-Hour Report | Report the $5,000 spend. | Form 496 |
| 4 | File Verification | Principal Officer signs oath of non-coordination. | Form 462 |
| 5 | Quarterly/Semi-Annual | Log the expense on your regular ledger. | Form 460 |
Q: I sent a mailer supporting a candidate, but I didn't ask them to approve it. However, I did use a photo I found on their website. Is that coordination? A: Generally, no. Using "republished" materials like photos available to the public is usually allowed. However, if you use their video footage, be careful—it can sometimes trigger coordination presumptions depending on the specific facts.
Q: I am the treasurer. Can I sign the Form 462 Verification? A: Only if you are also the Principal Officer (the person making the decisions). If you are just the bookkeeper, you cannot sign it. The law wants the person calling the shots to be on the hook for the perjury penalty.
Q: I filed the Form 496 with the Secretary of State. Do I need to send the Form 462 there too? A: No. Form 462 goes to the FPPC via email. Sending it to the Secretary of State does not count.
Q: What happens if I accidentally talk to the candidate about the ad? A: You have pierced the "Iron Wall." The expenditure is now a contribution. If the ad cost $10,000, and the contribution limit is $5,500, you have violated the law. You will likely be fined, and the candidate may have to return the "excess" value (which is impossible for an ad that already ran), leading to significant legal issues.